Frank
2007-10-08 13:44:46 UTC
A Plan for the Improvement of English Spelling
(from Mark Twain)
I was just trying to convert the following into something one could read
(before year one)
For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped to be
replased either by "k" or "s"and likewise "x"would no longer be part of the
alphabet. The only kase in which "c"would be retained would be the "ch"
formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might reform "w"spelling,
so that "which"and "one"would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might
well abolish "y"replasing it with "i"and Iear 4 might fiks the "g/j" anomali
wonse and for all. Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai
iear with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12
or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai
Iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez
"c","y"and "x"-- bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez -- tu
riplais "ch","sh"and "th"rispektivli. Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov
orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe
Ingliy-spiking werld.
so far I have
For example, in
Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped to be replaced either by "k"
or "s"and likewise "x"would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only case
in which "c"would be retained would be the "ch" formation, which will be
dealt with later.
Year 2 might reform "w"spelling, so that "which" and "one"would take the
same consonant, while
Year 3 might well abolish "y"replacing it with "i"and
year 4 might fiks the "g/j" anomaly wonse and for all. Generally, then, the
improvement would continue year by year with
Year 5 doing away with useless double consonants, and
Years 6-12 or so modifying vowel and the rimeining voist and unvoist
consonants. By
Year 15 or so, it would finally be possible tu meik ius ov thi ridandant
letez "c","y"and "x"-- by now just a memory in the maindz ov ould doderez --
tu riplais "ch","sh"and "th"rispektivli. Finally, xen, aafte sam 20 Years ov
orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt spelling in ius xrewawt xe
English-speaking world.
It seems to me not to make sense I find it hard to do the last bit
(from Mark Twain)
I was just trying to convert the following into something one could read
(before year one)
For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped to be
replased either by "k" or "s"and likewise "x"would no longer be part of the
alphabet. The only kase in which "c"would be retained would be the "ch"
formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might reform "w"spelling,
so that "which"and "one"would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might
well abolish "y"replasing it with "i"and Iear 4 might fiks the "g/j" anomali
wonse and for all. Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai
iear with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12
or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai
Iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez
"c","y"and "x"-- bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez -- tu
riplais "ch","sh"and "th"rispektivli. Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov
orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe
Ingliy-spiking werld.
so far I have
For example, in
Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped to be replaced either by "k"
or "s"and likewise "x"would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only case
in which "c"would be retained would be the "ch" formation, which will be
dealt with later.
Year 2 might reform "w"spelling, so that "which" and "one"would take the
same consonant, while
Year 3 might well abolish "y"replacing it with "i"and
year 4 might fiks the "g/j" anomaly wonse and for all. Generally, then, the
improvement would continue year by year with
Year 5 doing away with useless double consonants, and
Years 6-12 or so modifying vowel and the rimeining voist and unvoist
consonants. By
Year 15 or so, it would finally be possible tu meik ius ov thi ridandant
letez "c","y"and "x"-- by now just a memory in the maindz ov ould doderez --
tu riplais "ch","sh"and "th"rispektivli. Finally, xen, aafte sam 20 Years ov
orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt spelling in ius xrewawt xe
English-speaking world.
It seems to me not to make sense I find it hard to do the last bit